Login
Need to Register?   Forgot Password?
CMDManagement™ Newsletters


NEW THIS ISSUE!

See "Considering Cholesterol," our new patient-education tool. Once you get to this new feature page, click the "Download PDF" button and print out a copy. You can then photocopy and distribute this handy, plain-language summary of information. The more informed your patients are, the less challenging they are to treat.








Antonio M. Gotto, Jr, MD, DPhil
Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical
   College of Cornell University

Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, MD
University of California, San Diego,
   School of Medicine

Peter Ganz, MD
Harvard Medical School
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Scott M. Grundy, MD, PhD
University of Texas Southwestern
   Medical Center at Dallas

Steven M. Haffner, MD
University of Texas Health Science Center

Donald B. Hunninghake, MD
University of Minnesota Medical School

Ronald M. Krauss, MD
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
University of California, Berkeley

John C. LaRosa, MD
SUNY Downstate Medical Center

Peter Libby, MD
Harvard Medical School
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Harry L. Metcalf, MD
SUNY/Buffalo School of Medicine and
   Biomedical Sciences

©Professional Postgraduate Services® (PPS), a division of Physicians World/Thomson Healthcare, 2001, 400 Plaza Drive, Secaucus, NJ 07094. USA. All rights reserved.

This material may not be reproduced without the express written permission of PPS. LipidManagement™ is an educational initiative of the National Lipid Education Council™. NLEC™ and LipidManagement™ are trademarks used herein under license.






LipidManagement™ is certified for CME credit. Save your quarterly issues this year, as they will be needed for the CME posttest in December 2001.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading the articles in this issue of LipidManagement™, participants should be able to:

Identify coronary events categorized as acute coronary syndromes and explain the reasons for this classification
Discuss the clinical trials in which statins have been studied for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes
List established and newer treatments, both medical therapy and invasive procedures, for acute coronary syndromes
Intended audience:
primary care physicians, cardiologists, endocrinologists
Release date: March 30, 2001
End date: June 30, 2002

This newsletter series is sponsored by Professional Postgraduate Services® (PPS), a division of Physicians World/Thomson Healthcare.
   PPS is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
  PPS designates this educational activity for a maximum of 2 hours in category 1 credit towards the AMA Physician’s Recognition Award. Each physician should claim only those hours of credit that he/she actually spent in the educational activity.
   This newsletter series is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer Inc.







 
Related articles on this website:
In the Current Literature section, Use of Lipid-Lowering Medications at Discharge in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Data From the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 3
Fonarow GC, French WJ, Parsons LS, et al. Circulation. 2001;103:38-44.

Early Statin Treatment Following Acute Myocardial Infarction and 1-Year Survival
Stenestrand U, Wallentin L, for the Swedish Register of Cardiac Intensive Care (RIKS-HIA). JAMA. 2001;285:430-436.
Acute Coronary Syndromes:
An Evolving Paradigm


The past 100 years have seen significant advances in the understanding of factors leading to heart disease, thus enabling physicians to offer patients improved strategies for risk reduction. However, much remains to be understood about the treatment of heart diseases in the acute phase, which includes acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and unstable angina. The emerging focus on acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has yielded exciting research that provides clinicians with important information for improving cardiac care.

Therapeutic Options and Opinions
Secondary prevention and treatment of ACS may be considered along two strategies: invasive procedures and medical therapies. While revascularization techniques such as angioplasty may lessen the symptoms of angina and reduce long-term mortality in some patient subgroups, data are equivocal about the effects of such treatment on recurrent MI. Furthermore, revascularizations may be complicated by restenosis or accelerated atherogenesis in treated vessels that would require repeated procedures.
   In-hospital medical therapy during the acute phase has been characterized by the use of aspirin, heparin, intravenous nitrates, and (in certain patients) ß-blockers or calcium antagonists.1 Newer agents such as glycoprotein IIb/IIa inhibitors and low-molecular-weight heparin may also be used, depending on risk and whether surgical intervention is anticipated.1

 Figure. Characteristics of Plaques Prone to Rupture

Libby P. Circulation. 1995;91:2844-2850

The Benefits of Lipid Lowering in ACS
In secondary-prevention trials such as CARE (Cholesterol and Recurrent Events),2 LIPID (Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease),3 and 4S (Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study),4 treatment with statins as part of long-term follow-up in post-ACS patients has been shown to reduce the risks for recurrent MI, cerebrovascular events, and death from any cause. The AVERT (Atorvastatin Versus Revascularization Treatments) study5,6 noted that treatment with 80 mg/day of atorvastatin was associated with a significantly longer time to the first ischemic event (P=0.03) compared with invasive treatment, thus making a case for medical therapy as an important complement for surgical interventions.
   Researchers are now studying the effects of aggressive lipid modification in the early acute phase of coronary events on the risk for future events (see next page). The Swedish Registry Study7 provides intriguing observational data showing that initiating treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) earlier in the management of coronary patients improves survival, but this finding requires confirmation in a prospective, placebo-controlled interventional study. The MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering) trial will provide additional insights when results become available.

Statins and ACS
The attention on statins and the acute phase of coronary disease is justified by the improved understanding of the etiology of atherosclerotic disease. We know now that the coronary lesions that put the patient at greatest risk for an event are often not those that cause the greatest stenosis, but those that are only mildly to moderately stenotic with lipid-rich cores and thin fibrous caps (see Figure). The latter kind of lesion is vulnerable to plaque rupture with subsequent thrombosis that produces an ACS.8
   Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction appear to play key roles in producing this high-risk plaque. Statin therapy reduces markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein,9 and statins appear to improve endothelial vasodilatation in atherosclerotic vessels, possibly through their positive effect on expression of the powerful vasodilator nitric oxide.10 These antiinflammatory and endothelium-normalizing effects may contribute to a reduction in the risk for plaque rupture, thus illuminating potential mechanisms for the benefits observed with statins in clinical trials. Plaque stabilization may be especially relevant in the early, unstable phase following an acute event,11 although whether these effects are dependent or independent of the lipid lowering achieved with statins is controversial.

Looking to the Future of ACS Management
Researchers continue to explore strategies to further improve ACS outcomes. Currently being pursued are methods to restore and maintain coronary flow at the site of the vulnerable lesion; ways to reduce infarct size, reperfusion injury, and postischemic dysfunction; and strategies to reduce recurrent ischemic events by stabilizing underlying coronary arteriopathy. Thanks to the number and scope of these investigations, new life-saving techniques will continually be added to standard clinical management.11
   Some experts believe that optimal therapy for coronary heart disease might include a combination of a low-fat diet or a Mediterranean diet and endothelial passivation by means of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, lipid-lowering drugs, antioxidants, antiplatelet agents, and antiinflammatory agents.12
   Based on the emerging data, the future for improved ACS management looks promising. Eventually, a sophisticated multipronged strategy that will optimize patient outcomes following an acute coronary event may arise.


References
1. Abrams J. Medical therapy of unstable angina and non–Q-wave myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(suppl):24J-34J.
2. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1001-1009.
3. LIPID Study Group. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1349-1357.
4. Miettinen TA, Pyorala K, Olsson AG, et al. Cholesterol-lowering therapy in women and elderly patients with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris: findings from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Circulation. 1997;96:4211-4218.
5. McCormick LS, Black DM, Waters D, Brown WV, Pitt B, for the AVERT Investigators. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of a trial comparing aggressive lipid lowering with Atorvastatin Versus Revascularization Treatments. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1130-1133.
6. Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV, et al, for the Atorvastatin Versus Revascularization Treatments Trial Investigators. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:70-76.
7. Stenestrand U, Wallentin L, for the Swedish Register of Cardiac Intensive Care (RIKS-HIA). Early statin treatment following acute myocardial infarction and 1-year survival. JAMA. 2001;285:430-436.
8. Libby P. Coronary artery injury and the biology of atherosclerosis: inflammation, thrombosis, and stabilization. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(suppl):3J-9J.
9. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer MA, Sacks F, Braunwald E, for the CARE Investigators. Long-term effects of pravastatin on plasma concentration of c-reactive protein. Circulation. 1999;100:230-235.
10. Waters DD, Libby P. Introduction. A symposium: new directions in the understanding and management of acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(suppl):1J-2J.
11. Schwartz GG. Exploring new strategies for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(suppl):44J-50J.
12. Forrester JS. Role of plaque rupture in acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(suppl):15J-23J.

This newsletter is intended to provide current information on the management of dyslipidemias. Some of this information may include discussions of off-label, non–FDA-approved uses. Please refer to manufacturers’ full prescribing information before prescribing any agents mentioned herein.