|
NEW THIS ISSUE!
|
| See "Considering
Cholesterol," our new patient-education
tool. Once you get to this new feature page, click
the "Download PDF" button and print out
a copy. You can then photocopy and distribute this
handy, plain-language summary of information. The
more informed your patients are, the less challenging
they are to treat. |
|
|


Antonio
M. Gotto, Jr, MD, DPhil
Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical
College of Cornell University |
|
Elizabeth
Barrett-Connor, MD
University of California, San Diego,
School of Medicine
Peter Ganz, MD
Harvard Medical School
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Scott
M. Grundy, MD, PhD
University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center at Dallas
Steven
M. Haffner, MD
University of Texas Health Science Center
Donald B. Hunninghake, MD
University of Minnesota Medical School

Ronald M. Krauss, MD
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
University of California, Berkeley
John C. LaRosa, MD
SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Peter Libby, MD
Harvard Medical School
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Harry L. Metcalf, MD
SUNY/Buffalo School of Medicine and
Biomedical Sciences
©Professional Postgraduate Services®
(PPS), a division of Physicians World/Thomson Healthcare,
2001, 400 Plaza Drive, Secaucus, NJ 07094. USA. All
rights reserved.
This
material may not be reproduced without the express written
permission of PPS. LipidManagement is an
educational initiative of the National Lipid Education
Council™. NLEC™ and LipidManagement™ are trademarks
used herein under license.
LipidManagement is certified for CME credit.
Save your quarterly issues this year, as they will be
needed for the CME posttest in December 2001.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading the articles in this issue of LipidManagement,
participants should be able to:
| |
Identify coronary events categorized
as acute coronary syndromes and explain the reasons
for this classification |
| |
Discuss the clinical trials in
which statins have been studied for the treatment
of acute coronary syndromes |
| |
List established and
newer treatments, both medical therapy and invasive
procedures, for acute coronary syndromes |
Intended audience:
primary care physicians, cardiologists, endocrinologists
Release date: March 30, 2001
End date: June 30, 2002
This newsletter series is sponsored by Professional Postgraduate
Services® (PPS), a division
of Physicians World/Thomson Healthcare.
PPS is accredited by the Accreditation Council
for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing
medical education for physicians.
PPS designates this educational activity for
a maximum of 2 hours in category 1 credit towards the
AMA Physician’s Recognition Award. Each physician should
claim only those hours of credit that he/she actually
spent in the educational activity.
This newsletter series is supported by an
unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer Inc.
|
|
|

|
|
|
Acute Coronary
Syndromes:
An Evolving Paradigm
The
past 100 years have seen significant advances in the understanding
of factors leading to heart disease, thus enabling physicians to offer
patients improved strategies for risk reduction. However, much remains
to be understood about the treatment of heart diseases in the acute
phase, which includes acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and unstable
angina. The emerging focus on acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has yielded
exciting research that provides clinicians with important information
for improving cardiac care.
Therapeutic Options and Opinions
Secondary prevention and treatment of ACS may be considered along
two strategies: invasive procedures and medical therapies. While revascularization
techniques such as angioplasty may lessen the symptoms of angina and
reduce long-term mortality in some patient subgroups, data are equivocal
about the effects of such treatment on recurrent MI. Furthermore,
revascularizations may be complicated by restenosis or accelerated
atherogenesis in treated vessels that would require repeated procedures.
In-hospital medical therapy during the acute phase has
been characterized by the use of aspirin, heparin, intravenous nitrates,
and (in certain patients) ß-blockers or calcium antagonists.1
Newer agents such as glycoprotein IIb/IIa inhibitors and low-molecular-weight
heparin may also be used, depending on risk and whether surgical intervention
is anticipated.1
| Figure.
Characteristics of Plaques Prone to Rupture |

Libby P.
Circulation. 1995;91:2844-2850 |
The Benefits of Lipid Lowering in ACS
In secondary-prevention trials such as CARE (Cholesterol and Recurrent
Events),2 LIPID (Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin
in Ischaemic Disease),3 and 4S (Scandinavian Simvastatin
Survival Study),4 treatment with statins as part of long-term
follow-up in post-ACS patients has been shown to reduce the risks
for recurrent MI, cerebrovascular events, and death from any cause.
The AVERT (Atorvastatin Versus Revascularization Treatments) study5,6
noted that treatment with 80 mg/day of atorvastatin was associated
with a significantly longer time to the first ischemic event (P=0.03)
compared with invasive treatment, thus making a case for medical
therapy as an important complement for surgical interventions.
Researchers are now studying the effects of aggressive
lipid modification in the early acute phase of coronary events on
the risk for future events (see next page). The Swedish Registry
Study7 provides intriguing observational data showing
that initiating treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins)
earlier in the management of coronary patients improves survival,
but this finding requires confirmation in a prospective, placebo-controlled
interventional study. The MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction
with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering) trial will provide additional
insights when results become available.
Statins and ACS
The attention on statins and the acute phase of coronary disease
is justified by the improved understanding of the etiology of atherosclerotic
disease. We know now that the coronary lesions that put the patient
at greatest risk for an event are often not those that cause the
greatest stenosis, but those that are only mildly to moderately
stenotic with lipid-rich cores and thin fibrous caps (see Figure).
The latter kind of lesion is vulnerable to plaque rupture with subsequent
thrombosis that produces an ACS.8
Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction appear to
play key roles in producing this high-risk plaque. Statin therapy
reduces markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein,9
and statins appear to improve endothelial vasodilatation in atherosclerotic
vessels, possibly through their positive effect on expression of
the powerful vasodilator nitric oxide.10 These antiinflammatory
and endothelium-normalizing effects may contribute to a reduction
in the risk for plaque rupture, thus illuminating potential mechanisms
for the benefits observed with statins in clinical trials. Plaque
stabilization may be especially relevant in the early, unstable
phase following an acute event,11 although whether these
effects are dependent or independent of the lipid lowering achieved
with statins is controversial.
Looking to the Future of ACS Management
Researchers continue to explore strategies to further improve ACS
outcomes. Currently being pursued are methods to restore and maintain
coronary flow at the site of the vulnerable lesion; ways to reduce
infarct size, reperfusion injury, and postischemic dysfunction;
and strategies to reduce recurrent ischemic events by stabilizing
underlying coronary arteriopathy. Thanks to the number and scope
of these investigations, new life-saving techniques will continually
be added to standard clinical management.11
Some experts believe that optimal therapy for coronary
heart disease might include a combination of a low-fat diet or a
Mediterranean diet and endothelial passivation by means of angiotensin-converting
enzyme inhibitors, lipid-lowering drugs, antioxidants, antiplatelet
agents, and antiinflammatory agents.12
Based on the emerging data, the future for improved
ACS management looks promising. Eventually, a sophisticated multipronged
strategy that will optimize patient outcomes following an acute
coronary event may arise.
References
| 1. |
Abrams J. Medical therapy of unstable
angina and nonQ-wave myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol.
2000;86(suppl):24J-34J. |
| 2. |
Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA,
et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial
infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N
Engl J Med. 1996;335:1001-1009. |
| 3. |
LIPID Study Group. Prevention
of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients
with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol
levels. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1349-1357. |
| 4. |
Miettinen TA, Pyorala K, Olsson
AG, et al. Cholesterol-lowering therapy in women and elderly
patients with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris: findings
from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Circulation.
1997;96:4211-4218. |
| 5. |
McCormick LS, Black DM, Waters
D, Brown WV, Pitt B, for the AVERT Investigators. Rationale,
design, and baseline characteristics of a trial comparing aggressive
lipid lowering with Atorvastatin Versus Revascularization Treatments.
Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1130-1133. |
| 6. |
Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV, et
al, for the Atorvastatin Versus Revascularization Treatments
Trial Investigators. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared
with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. N Engl
J Med. 1999;341:70-76. |
| 7. |
Stenestrand U, Wallentin L, for
the Swedish Register of Cardiac Intensive Care (RIKS-HIA). Early
statin treatment following acute myocardial infarction and 1-year
survival. JAMA. 2001;285:430-436. |
| 8. |
Libby P. Coronary artery injury
and the biology of atherosclerosis: inflammation, thrombosis,
and stabilization. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(suppl):3J-9J. |
| 9. |
Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer MA,
Sacks F, Braunwald E, for the CARE Investigators. Long-term
effects of pravastatin on plasma concentration of c-reactive
protein. Circulation. 1999;100:230-235. |
| 10. |
Waters DD, Libby P. Introduction.
A symposium: new directions in the understanding and management
of acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(suppl):1J-2J. |
| 11. |
Schwartz GG. Exploring new strategies
for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol.
2000;86(suppl):44J-50J. |
| 12. |
Forrester JS. Role of plaque rupture
in acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(suppl):15J-23J. |
| This newsletter
is intended to provide current information on the management
of dyslipidemias. Some of this information may include discussions
of off-label, |
non–FDA-approved
uses. Please refer to manufacturers’ full prescribing information
before prescribing any agents mentioned herein. |
|